Tuesday, May 28, 2013

MARYLAND GRAND JURY BASICS: Attorney and Author Charles Jerome Ware

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com ("We fight.  You win.")

Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is renowned and consistently ranked among the best attorneys and legal counsellors in the United States. [GQ Magazine, The Washington Post, The Baltimore Sun, The Columbia Flier, USA TODAY, The Howard County Sun, The Anniston Star, The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX-TV NEWS, WHUR, WHUT, MPT, BBC, The Wall Street Journal, ABA Journal, et al.]

Generally Rule 6, inter alia, of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governs federal grand juries.  And generally again, Maryland Code, Criminal Procedure, §15-411, inter alia, address Maryland state grand juries.

Even though it is essentially controlled and run by the prosecution, the Grand Jury is also frequently referred to as the "People's Panel" because the ultimate decision to charge ("indict") someone is made by vote of the members of the grand jury, who are presumably selected from the community where the alleged offense(s) occurred.

BACKGROUND

The origin of the grand jury dates back to 12th century England. King John recognized it in the Magna Carta ‑‑ at the demand of the people.
The grand jury was originally a body of twelve, and later twenty-three men that served as accusers who presented indictments at the request of not only the prosecutor of the king, but also at the request of individual citizens. In 1681 the grand jury rule of secrecy was adopted. This allowed the grand jury to meet in secret, especially out of the sight of the king’s prosecutors who might interfere. This secrecy provided the grand jury great power as an independent body with oversight over the government.
The grand jury was brought from England to the American colonies. Grand juries provided a means for citizens to protest abuses by the king’s agents. When the Royal Governor of New York sought to have newspaper editor John Zenger indicted for seditious libel, the grand jury twice refused to issue indictments.
The U.S. Constitution mentions the grand jury in Article Five of the Bill of Rights:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or an indictment of a grand jury…
The grand jury served the public in two ways. First, it limited the power of government to prosecute citizens by permitting the grand jury to vote for or against an indictment and second, it had the power to make a presentment. A presentment was a public report of the grand jury’s activity. Through a presentment, the grand jury could make criminal activity known to the public, including criminal conduct committed by government officials, judges, or prosecutors.
It is significant that the grand jury is not part of any of the three branches of the U.S. government—it is a pre-constitutional institution.
 
Representing the Maryland State and Federal Grand Jury Witness
 
Representing grand jury witnesses presents unique problems.
 
The procedures are without parallel to any other aspect of criminal practice. Time is often so short that counsel may first meet the client in the morning only to be arguing against civil contempt by the afternoon.  Counsel and witness may know nothing about the grand jury's ultimate target. The
witness—whether or not she is represented—cannot take counsel with her into the grand jury
room.

The nervous witness must face the prosecutor and a room full (16-23 citizens) of people alone.
 
Like any legal problem, however, preparation is the key to handling the typical grand jury case.
 
The more important preparation is to become fluent with grand jury procedures. Since time is usually short and knowledge regarding the United States Attorney's purposes is scant,mistakes are easily made in the opening round. The first days or, in some instances, hours on the case are not the time to make your first acquaintance with the grand jury's procedures.

I will be presenting much more helpful information on this subject of "Maryland Grand Jury Basics" in coming blogs.  So, stay tuned.

[www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/Chapter 2: Grand Jury manual (DoJ); www.lawserver.com/Maryland Code, Criminal Procedure 15-411, 15-414; law.justia.com/codes/Maryland/2010/Section 4-103]

JUDGES DIES OF COCAINE OVERDOSE --- FELLOW JUDGE ARRESTED: Judiciary Update by Charles Ware, Attorney & Author

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

A St. Clair, Illinois drug court judge, Michael Cook, has been taken into custody and is under federal investigation following the death earlier this year of another judge, Joe Christ, in what a sheriff says was an apparent cocaine drug overdose.

Little is being said officially about why Circuit Court Judge Michael Cook, 43, who sits in St. Clair County, has been taken into custody. Court documents say his home and his family's rural hunting cabin were searched as part of the investigation. The hunting cabin is where associate judge Joseph D. Christ, 49, was found dead by Cook on March 10, according to KSDK and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch [www.ksdk.com/5-23-2013; www.stltoday.com/5-24-2013]..

"The deceased came back with cocaine levels in his blood and the cause of death preliminarily is a cocaine toxicity," Pike County Sheriff Paul Petty told the station.

The Belleville newspaper says the state's attorney filed more than 500 motions Thursday morning seeking a substitution of judge in cases that had been before Cook stating that his office has "actively assisted in and advanced a federal investigation of Cook," resulting in federal search warrants for the judge's person, his house in Belleville and the Pike County hunting cabin [www.bnd.com/5-24-2013].

Chief Circuit Judge John Baricevic said the court is cooperating with the federal investigation, which he declined to discuss, reports the News-Democrat. He said Cook's office has been secured and that he expects it to be searched at some point.

[www.abajournal.com/news/article/5-23-2012]

Friday, May 24, 2013

TEXAS "JUDGE GONE WILD" --- "JUDGE DREAD": Judicial Update by Author and Attorney Charles Ware

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com ("We fight.  You win.")


A Galveston Texas judge has been criminally charged by the Texas Attorney General's Office on 8 counts after allegedly misusing his official powers against lawyers.

In an action-packed day on Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013, a civil lawsuit was initially filed by a local lawyer, Greg Hughes, accusing Galveston County-Court-at-Law Judge Christopher Dupuy of incompetence and oppression and petitioning for his removal from office, reports the Houston Chronicle [www.chron.com/news/5-22-2013].

Then within hours the state attorney general's office presented indictments against Dupuy.  Additionally, the judge's ex-wife sought an emergency protective order on Wednesday after an affidavit was taken earlier in the week from the judge's former fiance claiming that he planned to kill his ex-wife, Adrienne Viterna, and flee with their children to New Zealand.

Judge Dupuy, who was arrested at 3 p.m. and posted bail of $19,000 within hours, couldn't be reached by the newspaper for comment. Dupuy was indicted on two counts of obstruction or retaliation, both felonies, and a total of six misdemeanor counts of official oppression and abuse of official capacity.

"He has ruined dozens of lives over the last two years with ridiculous, horrible rulings he has made," said attorney Greg Hughes, who filed the removal petition against Dupuy. It is going to be handled by the attorney general's office, the Chronicle says.

The indictment does not provide many details, but accuses the judge of criminal conduct concerning three attorneys (none of them is Hughes). One, Lori Laird, whom Dupuy allegedly used his office to oppress, represents Viterna in a child-custody case against Dupuy. After she tried to record his deposition testimony, the judge "held me in criminal contempt and gave me 120 days in jail," she told the Chronicle.

The contempt order was overturned on appeal.

The judge was arrested at the Galveston County Courthouse, where he and his ex-wife Adrienne Viterna were about to take part in an emergency custody hearing.

Attorney George Parnham represents Dupuy and told the station only "We are awaiting our day in court."

A show-cause hearing is scheduled on June 7, at which the judge can present arguments against his removal.

If Dupuy is convicted on any of the criminal counts, he will automatically be removed from office as a judge, the newspaper says.

[www.abajournal.com/news/May 23, 2013]

Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is renowned and consistently ranked among the best attorneys and legal counsellors in the United States. [GQ Magazine, The Washington Post, The Baltimore Sun, The Columbia Flier, USA TODAY, The Howard County Sun, The Anniston Star, The New York Times, et al.]

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

JURY "RETARDED" SAYS "GIRLS GONE WILD" FOUNDER JOE FRANCIS: Celebrity Case Update By Attorney Charles Ware

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com  ("We fight.  You win.")

Celebrity Case:  "Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis says jury that convicted him of false imprisonment should be "lined up and shot".

After being convicted of false imprisonment, in Los Angeles, California, Girls Gone Wild founder Joe Francis told the Hollywood Reporter that his jury was “retarded,” and should be killed.

"I want that jury to know that each and every one of you are mentally f--ing retarded and you should be euthanized because, as Darwin said, you have naturally selected yourself," he said, according to the Hollywood Reporter. "You are the weakest members of the herd. Goodbye! And if that jury wants to convict me because I didn't show up, which is the only reason why they did, then, you know, they should all be lined up and shot!"

Francis on May 6, 2013 was convicted of three counts of false imprisonment, one count of assault likely to cause great bodily injury and one count of dissuading a witness. The allegations involve three women Francis met at a Hollywood nightclub, who were celebrating a college graduation.

According to the Los Angeles city attorney’s office, the women got in Francis’ limo thinking he was giving them a ride to their car, but he instead took them to his home. A fight broke out, prosecutors said, and Francis assaulted one of the women.

The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declined to file charges after investigating the allegations, and referred the matter to the city attorney’s office, the Associated Press reports. Francis’ convictions in this matter are misdemeanors.

The jury was jealous of him, Francis also told the Hollywood Reporter. According to the article, Francis, his girlfriend and the reporter on the story drank multiple bottles of his “Double Diamond Bomber X cabernet" during the interview.

"The problem with the jury system is that anyone who's not smart enough to come with an excuse to get out of jury duty doesn't get out," Francis said. "Only the stupidest of the stupidest people end up on juries, you know? I've never met a smart person who's done jury duty."

According to the Wall Street Journal’s Bankruptcy Beat blog, Francis could be sentenced to serve five years, and has other legal issues as well. GGW Brands LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection earlier this year. R. Todd Neilson, the bankruptcy trustee, in April claimed that Francis threatened employees. The bankruptcy court issued a temporary restraining order against Francis, banning him from the company’s headquarters.

The company sought bankruptcy protection after Las Vegas mogul Steve Wynn got a $7.5 million defamation judgment against Francis, the Wall Street Journal reported in April. Francis falsely accused Wynn of deceiving customers, the article states, when Wynn attempted to collect a $2 million gambling debt Francis reportedly ran up during a 2007 casino visit.

Wynn’s lawyers dispute GGW’s assertion that Francis distanced himself from the business, the Wall Street Journal reports, and say that he uses the company to hide his assets from creditors.

[www.abajournal.com/news/article/ "Girls Gone Wild Founder says jury that convicted him should be 'lined up and shot'"]

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

The national criminal defense, wrongful death and serious injury law firm of Charles Jerome Ware P.A., Attorneys and Counsellors, is regarded as a leader in the areas of automobile death, criminal defense, personal injury, survivorship, and wrongful death actions in the mid-Atlantic region --- including Maryland, Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey and Virginia.

Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is renowned and consistently ranked among the best attorneys and legal counsellors in the United States. [GQ Magazine, The Washington Post, The Baltimore Sun, The Columbia Flier, USA TODAY, The Howard County Sun, The Anniston Star, The New York Times, et al.]

The national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, P.A., Attorneys and Counsellors, is a premier Civil litigation and Criminal Defense firm headquartered in Maryland and Washington, D.C. We are: "Still working. Still committed. Still here to make a difference."

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

CHINA'S WHITE-COLLAR CRIME DEATH PENALTIES (Women no exception)

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

Unlike in America, committing fraud, Ponzi schemes, investment schemes and other white-collar crimes in China can earn the defendant the death penalty.  And, women are no exception

Just recently a Chinese court sentenced a businesswoman to death after prosecutors accused her of running a Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors of about $70 million, shining a light on potential abuses in China's underground banking system and the severe penalties they can draw.

According to a statement posted this week on the court website of the city of Wenzhou—known for its thriving private sector and informal banking networks—39-year old Lin Haiyan started soliciting funds in 2007, promising investors high returns at low risk. The scheme unraveled in October 2011, with Ms. Lin owing her private backers 428 million yuan, it said.

Some other notable examples of death sentences for fraud in China include:

- Wu Ying, Nicknamed 'Rich Sister,' she was sentenced in 2009 for swindling 11 investors out of 380 million yuan. In April 2012, her sentence was stayed.  A woman.

- Du Yimin, Executed in August 2009 after her conviction for illegally raising more than 700 million yuan for investments ranging from beauty parlors to cosmetics to real estate.  Another woman.

- Wang Caiping, Sentenced in April 2012 after she completes two years in prison for borrowing more than 100 million yuan ($16 million) from victims along with her brother.  Another woman.

- Wang Zhendong, The general manager of an ant-breeding project was executed in November 2008 after being convicted for stealing three billion yuan from investors.  Another woman.

Informal sources of credit have long been the lifeblood of China's small private firms that typically can't access loans or other forms of finances from the country's formal financial institutions. But gathering funds to invest without regulatory approval is a legal gray area, and authorities sometimes crack down hard when investors lose money.

Analysts say a flood of cash that entered the economy following a massive stimulus push in 2009—China's response to the global financial crisis—exacerbated the potential for loans to go wrong in the informal lending sector as private financiers looked for places to put the additional cash. Such stumbles have put the underground lending sector under scrutiny, prompting calls from top Chinese leaders to bring it out in the open and for banks to broaden lending efforts to small businesses.

As of the end of April, 1,449 people had been "seriously punished"–a designation that includes the death penalty and more than five years imprisonment—for illegal fundraising since 2011, said Miao Youshui, a senior judge on the People's Supreme Court, China's highest judicial body, at a recent news conference. In total, 4,170 people were convicted over the same period for similar economic crimes, he said.

"I'm not optimistic" about controlling the spread of illegal fundraising, said Du Jinfu, the head of discipline inspection at China's banking regulator, and a member of a task force set up to tackle economic crimes. "One factor is the high frequency of cases. Also, the scope is broadening, with cases appearing in most cities…It affects the employed and retired, the rich and the poor."

According to a statement from the task force, illegal fundraising refers to soliciting funds publicly from private savers by offering a high return without regulatory approval to operate. But groups that oppose China's use of the death penalty in economic cases say the definition is fuzzy enough to encompass the informal lending that many businesses depend upon.

"The distinction between illegal fundraising and private lending still remains unclear," the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based human-rights group said February in a statement on its Web site.

China doesn't publicly report execution figures, but Dui Hua estimates that 4,000 prisoners were executed in 2011. China's death-penalty rates are higher than any other country in the world, according to Dui Hua figures. Amnesty International no longer reports execution data from China, but believes the yearly figure is "in the thousands."

According to the Wenzhou court's statement, Ms. Lin formally started her own investment company in May 2008, collecting funds from friends, colleagues, old classmates relatives, neighbors and others. The statement said she told investors that the funds were being invested in initial public offerings and share placements and even bank deposits, but instead she was speculating on futures and stocks, and using money raised by new investors to pay older clients their promised return.

Even as the investments turned sour, Ms. Lin continued to solicit new funds, the statement said. By October 2011 Ms. Lin could no longer cover up the extent of her cash-flow problems, it said.

[The Wall Street Journal, Saturday-Sunday, May 18-19, 2013, www.WSJ.com/"Investor Scheme Leads to Death Sentence"]

Monday, May 20, 2013

THE IMMIGRATION "BIBLE" --- Charles Ware & The South Carolina (S.C.) Book Festival


Exclusion and removal (deportation) proceedings, along with asylum hearings, are major staples for the United States Immigration Judge and the EOIR of the Department of Justice.

Generally speaking, all aliens to the United States must satisfy State Department consular officers abroad and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection inspectors upon entry to the U.S. that they (the aliens) are not ineligible for visas or admission under the so-called “grounds of inadmissibility” of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Officially, the nine (9) INA “grounds of inadmissibility” are:

(1)        health-related grounds

(2)        criminal history;

(3)        national security and terrorist concerns;

(4)        public charge (e.g., indigence);

(5)        seeking to work without proper labor certification;

(6)        illegal entrants and immigration law violations;

(7)        lacking proper documents;

(8)        ineligible for citizenship; and, of course,

(9)        aliens previously removed.
 
[Pages 89-90, Chapter 15, "Fundamentals of Immigration and Naturalization Law," THE IMMIGRATION PARADOX, by Attorney Charles Jerome Ware http://amzn.com/B007PLY6WA]

Among attorney and author Charles Jerome Ware's best-selling books are:

(1) The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests;
http://amzn.com/1432793888
(2) Understanding the Law: A Primer;
http://amzn.com/1440111456
(3) The Immigration Paradox: 15 Tips for Winning Immigration Cases;
http://amzn.com/1440171920
(4) Legal Consumer Tips and Secrets: Avoiding Debtors' Prison in the United States; and
http://amzn.com/1462051847
(5) Quince (15) Consejos Para Ganar Casos Del Inmigracion.
http://amzn.com/1462068952

Ware's blogs and twitter include, inter alia:

S.C. Book Festival 2013: "CONSUMER SECRETS AND TIPS"

www.Amazon.com/LegalConsumerTipsAndSecrets
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com


Legal Consumer Tips and Secrets: Avoiding Debtors' Prison in the United States [Hardcover]
Charles Jerome Ware (Author)


Book Description

September 20, 2011
If you owe too much money, you can go to prison even though you have not committed a crime. You can also be kicked out of your home and face a myriad of other negative consequences. Even so, the largest religion in the United States continues to be "consumerism"-the deeply held belief that buying goods and services makes us better and happier. Attorney Charles Jerome Ware explores how you can keep spending, maintain your freedom, and stand up for yourself. He shares ways to prevent foreclosure, discourage identity theft and other forms of fraud, avoid debt settlement scams, and rebuild your credit. This insider's guide reveals hundreds of facts to educate and inform the faithful American consumer. Don't be bullied into living like a pauper when you can take reasonable steps to improve your financial position. Changing your life and avoiding pitfalls starts with learning Legal Consumer Tips and Secrets.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. He has served as the special legal counsel to the chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, as a federal administrative law judge, and as a senior trial attorney in both the Antitrust Division and the Criminal Division of the US Justice Department. He lives with his family in Columbia, Maryland. --This text refers to the Paperback edition

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 236 pages
  • Publisher: iUniverse.com (September 20, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1462051847
  • ISBN-13: 978-1462051847
  • Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.7 x 8.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.4 ounces