Monday, December 22, 2014
FERGUSON MO. COURTS: DEBTORS' PRISONS?
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference." [Excerpt from the Associated Press, Thursday, December 18, 2014; Alan Scher Zagier]
Victim Michael Brown's untimely homicide by a local police officer is just one of the many grievances of the African American community against Ferguson, (St. Louis County) Missouri officials and government. In addition to the police, the town's municipal traffic has also been a prominent burden on local Blacks.
On a daily basis it has been in Ferguson's municipal traffic courts that low-income African American drivers have frequently seen their lives turned upside down by minor traffic offenses that have led to much larger problems. If the traffic tickets are left unpaid a $75 citation, for example, for driving with expired tags could in a relatively short period of time end up with an arrest warrant and even jail time.
St. Louis, County's 80 municipal courts (including Ferguson) are now being targeted by public-interest lawyers who argue that the traffic courts are virtual debtors' prisons; wrongfully extracting fines and fees from poor Black drivers and using the wrongfully-gained money to fund local governments, several in which serve just a few hundred White residents.
"They make people poor, and they keep people poor," said attorney Thomas Harvey of the nonprofit legal clinic ArchCity Defenders, which is suing Ferguson and six other St. Louis County small towns, alleging they collect illegal municipal court fees.
[And see, Chapter 19 - "Avoiding Debtor's Prison In The United States," Legal Consumer Tips And Secrets: Avoiding Debtors' Prison in the United States, by Attorney Charles Jerome Ware]
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference." We can help you. Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Thursday, December 11, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: ALERT! YOU CAN BE A VICTIM OF A FOREIGN LOTTERY AN...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: ALERT! YOU CAN BE A VICTIM OF A FOREIGN LOTTERY AN...: Remember: It is your legal responsibility to verify the legality of checks and money orders when you cash or deposit a draft or ...
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
ALERT! YOU CAN BE A VICTIM OF A FOREIGN LOTTERY AND STILL GO TO JAIL
Remember: It is your legal responsibility to verify the legality of checks and money orders when you cash or deposit a draft or receive funds wired into any of your bank accounts. By law, you are legally responsible and fully liable for any checks or money orders you cash anywhere in the world. Be aware that monies wired into any of your bank accounts by a stranger may be stolen funds. Therefore, you and your accounts could be used for money laundering.
Nigerian, Asian and Eastern European organized crime networks, particularly, are known to specialize in sending counterfeit checks and money orders to unsuspecting scam victims for the purpose of money laundering. These same crime networks acquire the account information of their scam victims and wire money stolen from another account holder into the scam victim’s account. In both cases, the scam victim is told to send a large portion of the money by Western Union or MoneyGram to fictitious names, usually in foreign countries. The scam victim has now engaged in money laundering and will owe the entire amount of money he or she has sent off. Further, and worse, the scam-victim is at high risk and exposure of being criminally charged, indicted, for theft, forgery, and money laundering.
It is Illegal for U.S. Citizens to enter Foreign Lotteries.
[see, Racketeering (Federal Statute), U.S. Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 95; www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/uscsup01181012095.html]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
http://amzn.com/1432793888
Nigerian, Asian and Eastern European organized crime networks, particularly, are known to specialize in sending counterfeit checks and money orders to unsuspecting scam victims for the purpose of money laundering. These same crime networks acquire the account information of their scam victims and wire money stolen from another account holder into the scam victim’s account. In both cases, the scam victim is told to send a large portion of the money by Western Union or MoneyGram to fictitious names, usually in foreign countries. The scam victim has now engaged in money laundering and will owe the entire amount of money he or she has sent off. Further, and worse, the scam-victim is at high risk and exposure of being criminally charged, indicted, for theft, forgery, and money laundering.
It is Illegal for U.S. Citizens to enter Foreign Lotteries.
[see, Racketeering (Federal Statute), U.S. Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 95; www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/uscsup01181012095.html]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
Book Description
Publication Date: July 26, 2012There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
Product Details
- Paperback: 166 pages
- Publisher: Outskirts Press (July 26, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1432793888
- ISBN-13: 978-1432793883
http://amzn.com/1432793888
CHAPTER 10: WINNING THE LOTTERY BY AVOIDING LOTTERY SCAMS
________________________________________________________________________
Successful lottery winners know how to avoid lottery scams, jokes and pranks. So, be careful.
(2) The lottery is unknown, or unidentifiable. Unless, of course, you find it on a lottery scam website. In any event, avoid it. It is most likely a scam.
(3) The lottery’s name is a company name, like Gateway or Verizon. Lotteries are not sponsored by merchants, companies, or individuals, except through a sweepstakes.
(4) Again, remember ((3), above), lotteries are not sponsored by individuals, no matter how wealthy they are. Bill Gates or the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, or some official in Nigeria, do not, and cannot, sponsor lotteries.
(5) You do not live in the lottery country, and you are not a citizen of the lottery country. Most lotteries are restricted to residents of the state, province, or country in which the game is played.
(6) Since no one is permitted to use your email address without your specific and expressed permission, it is not possible for your email address to win in any random email drawing.
(7) It’s a scam letter if you did not register your name, street address, email address, telephone number, and a credit card BEFORE you were allowed to buy a ticket on an online pay-to-play lottery web site.
(8) You cannot win the lottery simply by participating in surveys. Legitimate surveys do not purchase lottery tickets for you. Invariably, surveys that promise lottery tickets are probably ID Theft scams. Be aware of this.
(9) Legitimate lotteries (and sweepstakes as well) generally advertise their games on a daily basis. If your alleged lottery is not doing that, and you are not aware of them, or it, be extremely cautious.
(10) Remember: If you are required to pay money after you have allegedly won the lottery, it is probably a scam. [Legal Consumer Tips and Secrets, Chapter 11, Charles Jerome Ware, iUniverse Pub. (2011); Understanding the Law: A Primer, Charles Jerome Ware, iUniverse Pub. (2008)]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
http://amzn.com/1432793888
Successful lottery winners know how to avoid lottery scams, jokes and pranks. So, be careful.
- Ten (10) Tips for Identifying Lottery Scam Emails and Letters:
(2) The lottery is unknown, or unidentifiable. Unless, of course, you find it on a lottery scam website. In any event, avoid it. It is most likely a scam.
(3) The lottery’s name is a company name, like Gateway or Verizon. Lotteries are not sponsored by merchants, companies, or individuals, except through a sweepstakes.
(4) Again, remember ((3), above), lotteries are not sponsored by individuals, no matter how wealthy they are. Bill Gates or the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, or some official in Nigeria, do not, and cannot, sponsor lotteries.
(5) You do not live in the lottery country, and you are not a citizen of the lottery country. Most lotteries are restricted to residents of the state, province, or country in which the game is played.
(6) Since no one is permitted to use your email address without your specific and expressed permission, it is not possible for your email address to win in any random email drawing.
(7) It’s a scam letter if you did not register your name, street address, email address, telephone number, and a credit card BEFORE you were allowed to buy a ticket on an online pay-to-play lottery web site.
(8) You cannot win the lottery simply by participating in surveys. Legitimate surveys do not purchase lottery tickets for you. Invariably, surveys that promise lottery tickets are probably ID Theft scams. Be aware of this.
(9) Legitimate lotteries (and sweepstakes as well) generally advertise their games on a daily basis. If your alleged lottery is not doing that, and you are not aware of them, or it, be extremely cautious.
(10) Remember: If you are required to pay money after you have allegedly won the lottery, it is probably a scam. [Legal Consumer Tips and Secrets, Chapter 11, Charles Jerome Ware, iUniverse Pub. (2011); Understanding the Law: A Primer, Charles Jerome Ware, iUniverse Pub. (2008)]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
Book Description
Publication Date: July 26, 2012There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
Product Details
- Paperback: 166 pages
- Publisher: Outskirts Press (July 26, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1432793888
- ISBN-13: 978-1432793883
http://amzn.com/1432793888
GAMBLING, ODDS AND PROBABILITIES
A. The “Professional Gambler”
It is because the odds and probabilities of someone winning on a regular or consistent basis are so remote that the concept of a person being a “professional” gambler (making a living at gambling) is not practical nor realistic.
I have observed that, at best, the most fortunate (or lucky) gambler will lose at least 52% of the time. In casinos and gambling “houses” all over, the person or player who wins more than he or she loses is considered a “cheat” or a “card counter” (in poker or blackjack card games), and is therefore banned from participating.
Remember this: When you gamble, you are paying your money for “entertainment”.
B. Odds and Probabilities
Far too many “gamblers” do not understand what probabilities and odds really mean. Consider the following scenario:
Assume that a gambler’s odds of winning a particular prize in a drawing or raffle are 1 in 10. This means that if only 10 raffle tickets are sold and put “in the hat” so to speak, the hopeful gambler would have one ticket in the drawing.
However, if the drawing or raffle sold 100 tickets and drew for 10 prizes, the gambler is still not guaranteed to win, even though the odds suggest he or she will win.
Odds can be misleading to gamblers, therefore it is helpful for the player to understand the mathematics behind probabilities.
Probabilities do not guarantee winnings. Probabilities simply propose a likelihood of winning. [mathcentral.uregina.ca/beyond/articles/gambling/odds.html]
C. The Concept of “Independent Events”
The Concept of “Independent Events” helps explain the odds of winning in gambling. It is frequently misunderstood by gamblers. Independent events is a probability term meaning that past events actually have no influence on future outcomes.
In other words, in “gambling” history does not matter.
Take, for example, the flipping of a coin four consecutive times. Under the concept of independent events, the probability of getting four heads in this scenario is as follows:
(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)=1/16
The reason for this is because the probability of flipping a head if you flip a coin is (an independent event). Therefore, no matter how many times you flip a coin, the probability of getting a head remains the same: 1/2.
The problem that many gamblers have, however, is that they believe or hope that the first three flips (for example) will somehow influence the fourth flip. It does not. That is a misunderstanding. The probability remains the same for each and every flip of the coin: 1/2.
In “gambling” history does not matter.
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
http://amzn.com/1432793888
It is because the odds and probabilities of someone winning on a regular or consistent basis are so remote that the concept of a person being a “professional” gambler (making a living at gambling) is not practical nor realistic.
I have observed that, at best, the most fortunate (or lucky) gambler will lose at least 52% of the time. In casinos and gambling “houses” all over, the person or player who wins more than he or she loses is considered a “cheat” or a “card counter” (in poker or blackjack card games), and is therefore banned from participating.
Remember this: When you gamble, you are paying your money for “entertainment”.
B. Odds and Probabilities
Far too many “gamblers” do not understand what probabilities and odds really mean. Consider the following scenario:
Assume that a gambler’s odds of winning a particular prize in a drawing or raffle are 1 in 10. This means that if only 10 raffle tickets are sold and put “in the hat” so to speak, the hopeful gambler would have one ticket in the drawing.
However, if the drawing or raffle sold 100 tickets and drew for 10 prizes, the gambler is still not guaranteed to win, even though the odds suggest he or she will win.
Odds can be misleading to gamblers, therefore it is helpful for the player to understand the mathematics behind probabilities.
Probabilities do not guarantee winnings. Probabilities simply propose a likelihood of winning. [mathcentral.uregina.ca/beyond/articles/gambling/odds.html]
C. The Concept of “Independent Events”
The Concept of “Independent Events” helps explain the odds of winning in gambling. It is frequently misunderstood by gamblers. Independent events is a probability term meaning that past events actually have no influence on future outcomes.
In other words, in “gambling” history does not matter.
Take, for example, the flipping of a coin four consecutive times. Under the concept of independent events, the probability of getting four heads in this scenario is as follows:
(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)=1/16
The reason for this is because the probability of flipping a head if you flip a coin is (an independent event). Therefore, no matter how many times you flip a coin, the probability of getting a head remains the same: 1/2.
The problem that many gamblers have, however, is that they believe or hope that the first three flips (for example) will somehow influence the fourth flip. It does not. That is a misunderstanding. The probability remains the same for each and every flip of the coin: 1/2.
In “gambling” history does not matter.
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
Book Description
Publication Date: July 26, 2012There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
Product Details
- Paperback: 166 pages
- Publisher: Outskirts Press (July 26, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1432793888
- ISBN-13: 978-1432793883
http://amzn.com/1432793888
Chapter 1: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOTTERIES, SWEEPSTAKES AND CONTESTS
Lotteries
A. Lotteries are prize drawing in which, generally, people must pay money to buy a chance to win. The "win" or prize is frequently cash. Lotteries are usually well-regulated by the government, and now-a-days are generally only legal when they are run by the government [http://contests.about.com/od]A lottery is a form of gambling which involves the drawing of lots for a prize. Another word for lots is tickets. The usual goal of lotteries is to raise money ***
Sweepstakes
B. Sweepstakes are prize giveaways in which the winners are essentially chosen by luck, with some notable exceptions as outlined in this book.
I know a lot about sweepstakes.
With persistence and research your "luck" can be enhanced, and even made, with sweepstakes. Sweepstakes prizes can cover the gamut from t-shirts and stickers; to credit cards and cash, from vacations to cars, to houses ***
Contests
C. Contests generally involve some skill. Winners are selected in contests based upon some merit, unlike sweepstakes which are based on chance, and lotteries which are considered a form of gambling.
In contests, for example, the person judged to have the best essay, the best photograph, the chosen recipe, the most moving poem, and so forth, wins. Contests are usually allowed to charge an entry fee.
Many people mistakenly use the terms "sweepstakes" and "contests" interchangeably. Technically, as we have stated, the two are different. Contests are giveaways that have some level of skill involved in them; sweepstakes are games of chance or "luck".
EXCERPTED FROM:The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
Book Description
Publication Date: July 26, 2012There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
Product Details
- Paperback: 166 pages
- Publisher: Outskirts Press (July 26, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1432793888
- ISBN-13: 978-1432793883
http://amzn.com/1432793888
LOTTERY PROBABILITY: LOGIC AND REASON
Probability
When playing the lottery, entering sweepstakes, as well as competing in contests, the thrust of your strategy should be to increase your probability of winning.
Probability starts with logic, and logic refers to reason.
Probability is defined as the rapport of the favorable cases over total cases, or calculated as:
P = n/N
Be reasonable and logical when playing lotteries, sweepstakes, and contests, and you will increase your probabilities of winning!
[Also see, "Example for Creating 'Pick-3' (and even 'Pick-4') Number Lotto Algorithms Using Logic", Chapter VI, infra, as well as "Winning Pick-3 and Pick-4 Lottery Games", Chapter V, infra]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
http://amzn.com/1432793888
When playing the lottery, entering sweepstakes, as well as competing in contests, the thrust of your strategy should be to increase your probability of winning.
Probability starts with logic, and logic refers to reason.
Probability is defined as the rapport of the favorable cases over total cases, or calculated as:
P = n/N
Be reasonable and logical when playing lotteries, sweepstakes, and contests, and you will increase your probabilities of winning!
[Also see, "Example for Creating 'Pick-3' (and even 'Pick-4') Number Lotto Algorithms Using Logic", Chapter VI, infra, as well as "Winning Pick-3 and Pick-4 Lottery Games", Chapter V, infra]
EXCERPTED FROM:
The Secret Science of Winning Lotteries, Sweepstakes and Contests: Laws, Strategies, Formulas and Statistics [Paperback]Charles Ware (Author)
Book Description
Publication Date: July 26, 2012There is a science of winning lotteries, sweepstakes and contests! When it comes to lotteries, sweepstakes and contests, there are ways to improve your odds or probability of winning. They are discussed in this book, with a lot of detail and some humor. Blind reliance on luck or chance is not necessary to win lotteries, sweepstakes and contests. The "4Ps" of persistence, preparation, poise and a positive mental attitude are necessary to win on a consistent or regular basis. Therefore, just about anyone is capable of winning. Charles Jerome Ware is a noted author and attorney, microeconomist, lotterician, sweepstaker and contester. He is a principal in the national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors. Dr. Ware is a highly successful and life-long sweepstaker and contester. He is also a successful lotterician who, for several years, has investigated, monitored and researched lotteries throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Dr. Ware is the recipient of numerous awards for his accomplishments in law and other areas. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.
Product Details
- Paperback: 166 pages
- Publisher: Outskirts Press (July 26, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1432793888
- ISBN-13: 978-1432793883
http://amzn.com/1432793888
Monday, December 8, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: TOP MARYLAND DEFENSE ATTORNEY OFFERS TIPS: Blurred...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: TOP MARYLAND DEFENSE ATTORNEY OFFERS TIPS: Blurred...: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." The holiday season of joy can very quickly turn into a holiday season o...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: TOP MARYLAND DEFENSE ATTORNEY OFFERS TIPS: Blurred...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: TOP MARYLAND DEFENSE ATTORNEY OFFERS TIPS: Blurred...: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." The holiday season of joy can very quickly turn into a holiday season o...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: KEY MARYLAND HOLIDAY CHECKPOINTS AND STRATEGIES, 2...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: KEY MARYLAND HOLIDAY CHECKPOINTS AND STRATEGIES, 2...: Local Maryland police departments have announced key Maryland holiday DUI checkpoints, including sobriety checkpoints as well as strategies ...
TOP MARYLAND DEFENSE ATTORNEY OFFERS TIPS: Blurred Lines and Slurred Words
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
The holiday season of joy can very quickly turn into a holiday season of gloom when celebrants fail to drink responsibly, and then drive.
Maryland drunk driving laws are strict, and they can be complex and complicated. The bottom line in the State of Maryland is: Do not drink and drive.
Some other tips are as follows:
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
The holiday season of joy can very quickly turn into a holiday season of gloom when celebrants fail to drink responsibly, and then drive.
Maryland drunk driving laws are strict, and they can be complex and complicated. The bottom line in the State of Maryland is: Do not drink and drive.
Some other tips are as follows:
- When you are away from your residence and drinking alcohol, always (a) have a designated non-drinking trustworthy companion take you home or (b) hire a taxi, etc., to deliver you safely at your residence.
- Friends do not let friends drive while intoxicated. Therefore, watch behavior changes in your companions.
Behavior changes. There is a rough correlation between how much alcohol a person has consumed and their behavior. This means it will be easier to tell if a close friend or family member is drunk because of prior experience and observations. The same is not true of a co-worker, or someone who is less familiar. - Talking loud and essentially saying nothing. "Babbling"---loud babbling can occur with increased intoxication.
High volume talking. One early and obvious sign of impairment is loud talking. The more alcohol is consumer, the louder the drinker gets. - Getting happier or becoming meaner.
Low inhibition. At relatively low levels of intoxication, a drinker may start to lose emotional restraint and become more vivacious. This may become obvious when a normally restrained or introverted person starts to become the life of the party. Alternatively, a usually amiable house-guest may start to grouse about everything, or even start fights. These behaviors suggest mild impairment of judgment, and should be considered strong warning signs that its time to take away the keys. - What was he or she thinking when they did that? That's the point: they were not thinking.
Poor judgment. Some people begin to behave inappropriately when they drink. They may swear, engage in unwanted flirting, and tell tasteless jokes. - "Blurred lines" and "slurred words."
Slurred words. As the night wears on even more serious signs of intoxication may start to become apparent. For example, the drinker may start to exhibit slight slurring of speech. Mild impairment of judgment may move on to full emotional instability which is often accompanied by inappropriate laughter. Seeing these signs is a clue that it might be time to either make up a bed for a house guest, or to call them a cab.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
The Lawyer's Mailbox: COMMON LAW MARRIAGES AND DIVORCES IN MARYLAND
The Lawyer's Mailbox: COMMON LAW MARRIAGES AND DIVORCES IN MARYLAND: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." A "common law" marriage, defined or described as a relationsh...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: NO GUARANTEES: GRANDPARENT RIGHTS IN MARYLAND
The Lawyer's Mailbox: NO GUARANTEES: GRANDPARENT RIGHTS IN MARYLAND: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." [The information provided herein is not designed nor intended to be leg...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: UNDERSTANDING MARYLAND DUI & DWI LAWS
The Lawyer's Mailbox: UNDERSTANDING MARYLAND DUI & DWI LAWS: Maryland drunk driving laws are can be complicated and complex. There are multiple charges that fall under the umbrella of drunk driving in ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: THE "GRAND JURY" AND "THE HAM SANDWICH": MARYLAND ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: THE "GRAND JURY" AND "THE HAM SANDWICH": MARYLAND ...: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." I heard the phrase many years ago when I was a first-year law student. ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: LEAD PAINT POISONING DEFENSE (LPPD): Maryland Lead...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: LEAD PAINT POISONING DEFENSE (LPPD): Maryland Lead...: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . "Here to make a difference." Ross v. Hous. Auth. of Baltimore City , 430 Md. 648, 63 A.3d 1 (2013). ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND LEAD POISONING DEFENDANT UPDATE: Experts ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND LEAD POISONING DEFENDANT UPDATE: Experts ...: www.CharlesJeromeWare.com . Charles Jerome Ware is a principal in the Maryland-based national lead-based paint poisoning defense law firm o...
MARYLAND LEAD POISONING DEFENDANT UPDATE: Experts Must Have Expertise And Facts To Testify
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.
Charles Jerome Ware is a principal in the Maryland-based national lead-based paint poisoning defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, LLC, Attorneys and Counselors. Should the reader have specific questions or desire an initial courtesy consultation, Attorney Ware can be reached at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016, or emailed at charlesjeromeware@msn.com. He can help you.
Numerous commentators have suggested that in certain circumstances in Baltimore lead-based paint poisoning cases are "indefensible." I respectfully disagree. Properly litigated lead paint cases should, and can, provide defendant landlords, etc., with proper defenses. With the high volume of lead cases filed in Maryland (and in particular, Baltimore) every year, a helpful number of these cases are appealed to Maryland's appellate courts.
One of these recent decisions and opinions addresses the important issue of the need for qualified expert witnesses in these cases to have both the necessary expertise as well as supporting facts to testify:
City Homes, Inc. v. Hazelwood, 210 Md. App. 615, 63 A.3d 713 (2013), cert. denied, 432 Md. 468, 69 A.3d 476 (2013).
Experts must have expertise and supporting facts to testify. In Hazelwood, the Court of Special Appeals outlined the lack of qualifications and insufficient factual basis of an expert who was to offer opinions regarding alleged injury from childhood lead poisoning as well as the source of the lead ingestion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the "expert" M.D.’s testimony because the doctor had never evaluated,
diagnosed or monitored the progress of children diagnosed with elevated lead levels, had never been involved in any environmental tests dealing with the presence of lead, was not
a Maryland certified Lead Risk Assessor, had never published any articles related to lead nor delivered any lectures on lead ingestion, did not examine Plaintiff nor performed a medical or nutritional history of Plaintiff, could not recall performing a differential diagnosis on a pediatric patient in which he had determined that the symptoms were due to lead ingestion, and could not cite a single instance in which he identified “source.”
The Court of Special Appeals held that the doctor's exclusion was not an abuse of discretion.
The Court also opined, in dicta, that an environmental expert must have knowledge as to how the XRF lead-testing machine was actually operated at a subject property if he was to testify regarding that testing. The Court warned that general knowledge of how an XRF machine is typically used would be insufficient to support testimony regarding specific testing.
Charles Jerome Ware is a principal in the Maryland-based national lead-based paint poisoning defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, LLC, Attorneys and Counselors. Should the reader have specific questions or desire an initial courtesy consultation, Attorney Ware can be reached at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016, or emailed at charlesjeromeware@msn.com. He can help you.
Numerous commentators have suggested that in certain circumstances in Baltimore lead-based paint poisoning cases are "indefensible." I respectfully disagree. Properly litigated lead paint cases should, and can, provide defendant landlords, etc., with proper defenses. With the high volume of lead cases filed in Maryland (and in particular, Baltimore) every year, a helpful number of these cases are appealed to Maryland's appellate courts.
One of these recent decisions and opinions addresses the important issue of the need for qualified expert witnesses in these cases to have both the necessary expertise as well as supporting facts to testify:
City Homes, Inc. v. Hazelwood, 210 Md. App. 615, 63 A.3d 713 (2013), cert. denied, 432 Md. 468, 69 A.3d 476 (2013).
Experts must have expertise and supporting facts to testify. In Hazelwood, the Court of Special Appeals outlined the lack of qualifications and insufficient factual basis of an expert who was to offer opinions regarding alleged injury from childhood lead poisoning as well as the source of the lead ingestion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the "expert" M.D.’s testimony because the doctor had never evaluated,
diagnosed or monitored the progress of children diagnosed with elevated lead levels, had never been involved in any environmental tests dealing with the presence of lead, was not
a Maryland certified Lead Risk Assessor, had never published any articles related to lead nor delivered any lectures on lead ingestion, did not examine Plaintiff nor performed a medical or nutritional history of Plaintiff, could not recall performing a differential diagnosis on a pediatric patient in which he had determined that the symptoms were due to lead ingestion, and could not cite a single instance in which he identified “source.”
The Court of Special Appeals held that the doctor's exclusion was not an abuse of discretion.
The Court also opined, in dicta, that an environmental expert must have knowledge as to how the XRF lead-testing machine was actually operated at a subject property if he was to testify regarding that testing. The Court warned that general knowledge of how an XRF machine is typically used would be insufficient to support testimony regarding specific testing.
LEAD PAINT POISONING DEFENSE (LPPD): Maryland Lead Defense Attorney
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
Ross v. Hous. Auth. of Baltimore City, 430 Md. 648, 63 A.3d 1 (2013).
The Maryland Court of Appeals has held that, while Plaintiff’s medical expert was properly excluded as an expert as to the “source” of the Plaintiff’s lead exposure, the exclusion of that testimony did not preclude the Plaintiff from establishing the causal link by circumstantial evidence at trial.
To prove that the Defendant’s subject premises was a “substantial factor,” and therefore caused the Plaintiff’s injuries resulting from lead exposure, the premises (1) must have been a source of the Plaintiff’s exposure to lead, (2) the exposure must have contributed to the elevated blood lead levels, and (3) the associated increase in blood lead levels must have been substantial enough to contribute to the Plaintiff’s injuries.
The Court held that an expert is not necessary in order to establish prong (1), but that expert testimony might be essential in proving prongs (2) and (3).
The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the circuit court on the basis that the fact-finder could infer from the evidence that lead exposure at the subject premises was a substantial contributing factor to the Plaintiff’s blood lead levels without the testimony of a causation expert.
[Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is a nationally-respected, Maryland-based, lead paint poisoning defense attorney. For questions or an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016; or email him at charlesjeromeware@msn.com]
Ross v. Hous. Auth. of Baltimore City, 430 Md. 648, 63 A.3d 1 (2013).
The Maryland Court of Appeals has held that, while Plaintiff’s medical expert was properly excluded as an expert as to the “source” of the Plaintiff’s lead exposure, the exclusion of that testimony did not preclude the Plaintiff from establishing the causal link by circumstantial evidence at trial.
To prove that the Defendant’s subject premises was a “substantial factor,” and therefore caused the Plaintiff’s injuries resulting from lead exposure, the premises (1) must have been a source of the Plaintiff’s exposure to lead, (2) the exposure must have contributed to the elevated blood lead levels, and (3) the associated increase in blood lead levels must have been substantial enough to contribute to the Plaintiff’s injuries.
The Court held that an expert is not necessary in order to establish prong (1), but that expert testimony might be essential in proving prongs (2) and (3).
The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the circuit court on the basis that the fact-finder could infer from the evidence that lead exposure at the subject premises was a substantial contributing factor to the Plaintiff’s blood lead levels without the testimony of a causation expert.
[Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is a nationally-respected, Maryland-based, lead paint poisoning defense attorney. For questions or an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016; or email him at charlesjeromeware@msn.com]
THE "GRAND JURY" AND "THE HAM SANDWICH": MARYLAND TRIAL ATTORNEY SPEAKS
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
I heard the phrase many years ago when I was a first-year law student. I have heard it, as well as used it myself, over the many years since law school. The popular phrase among lawyers is this: "The grand jury can indict a ham sandwich."
Though obviously exaggerated, the phrase is not far from being true. The grand jury is a secret group of people called upon to make a very important decision who are controlled by the prosecution. The decision they are called upon to make is whether a person will be officially charged (indicted) for allegedly committing a crime.
By its very secret and insular nature, the grand jury can be an extremely subjective body of decision makers. Both bad and good decisions come out of grand juries every day in the United States.
Technically speaking, a grand jury is a legal body that is empowered to conduct official proceedings to investigate potential criminal conduct and to determine whether criminal charges should be brought. A grand jury may compel the production of documents and may compel the sworn testimony of witnesses to appear before it. A grand jury is separate from the courts, which do not preside over its functioning.
The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution provides "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger..."
The United States is virtually the only country that retains grand juries, although some other common law jurisdictions formerly employed them, and most other jurisdictions employ some other type of preliminary hearing. Grand juries perform both accusatory and investigatory functions. The investigatory functions of the grand jury include obtaining and reviewing documents and other evidence and hearing the sworn testimony of witnesses that appear before it. The grand jury's accusatory function is to determine whether or not there is probable cause to believe that one or more persons committed a certain offense within the venue of the district court.
The "grand jury" in the United States is composed of 12 to 23 citizens
[see, U.S. v. Williams, Jr., 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36 (1992); "State Grand Juries," Susan Brenner and Lori Shaw, Univ. of Dayton School of Law (2003); "Frequently Asked Questions About the Grand Jury System," American Bar Association (ABA), http://www.aba-now.org (2010)]
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference." We can help you. Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
I heard the phrase many years ago when I was a first-year law student. I have heard it, as well as used it myself, over the many years since law school. The popular phrase among lawyers is this: "The grand jury can indict a ham sandwich."
Though obviously exaggerated, the phrase is not far from being true. The grand jury is a secret group of people called upon to make a very important decision who are controlled by the prosecution. The decision they are called upon to make is whether a person will be officially charged (indicted) for allegedly committing a crime.
By its very secret and insular nature, the grand jury can be an extremely subjective body of decision makers. Both bad and good decisions come out of grand juries every day in the United States.
Technically speaking, a grand jury is a legal body that is empowered to conduct official proceedings to investigate potential criminal conduct and to determine whether criminal charges should be brought. A grand jury may compel the production of documents and may compel the sworn testimony of witnesses to appear before it. A grand jury is separate from the courts, which do not preside over its functioning.
The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution provides "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger..."
The United States is virtually the only country that retains grand juries, although some other common law jurisdictions formerly employed them, and most other jurisdictions employ some other type of preliminary hearing. Grand juries perform both accusatory and investigatory functions. The investigatory functions of the grand jury include obtaining and reviewing documents and other evidence and hearing the sworn testimony of witnesses that appear before it. The grand jury's accusatory function is to determine whether or not there is probable cause to believe that one or more persons committed a certain offense within the venue of the district court.
The "grand jury" in the United States is composed of 12 to 23 citizens
[see, U.S. v. Williams, Jr., 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36 (1992); "State Grand Juries," Susan Brenner and Lori Shaw, Univ. of Dayton School of Law (2003); "Frequently Asked Questions About the Grand Jury System," American Bar Association (ABA), http://www.aba-now.org (2010)]
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference." We can help you. Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
UNDERSTANDING MARYLAND DUI & DWI LAWS
Maryland drunk driving laws are can be complicated and complex. There are multiple charges that fall under the umbrella of drunk driving in Maryland, and there are different penalties for each charge. The two main charges are known as driving under the influence (DUI) and driving while impaired or operating while impaired (DWI or OWI) in Maryland.
(1) Driving while impaired (DWI) is considered a lesser offense than driving under the influence (DUI), and thus the penalties for DWI are less severe than those for DUI.
(2) You may be arrested and charged with a DUI in Maryland if, via chemical testing, a police officer determines that your blood-alcohol content is .08 percent or higher. This is the legal limit in Maryland and in just about every other state in the U.S.
(3) To receive the lesser charge of a DWI in Maryland, your blood-alcohol content must fall between .07 and .08 percent. Once again, this will be determined through chemical testing.
(2) One of the most common reasons an officer may pull you over is because you committed a traffic violation. Examples of traffic violations include:
(2) Field sobriety testing is used by Maryland police to determine whether someone is probably drunk. Possible field sobriety tests that an officer might use in a Maryland drunk driving incident include:
(2) For example, you may have your driver's license immediately suspended for 120 days for a first offense. After that, you could have your license suspended for one year, just for refusing a breathalyzer test.
(3) Maryland is one of a handful of states that does allow you to have an attorney present while taking a chemical test to determine blood-alcohol content. Once arrested by police, you will have the constitutional right to a DWI attorney. As long as your lawyer can appear within two hours of your arrest, you can delay your chemical testing until your attorney arrives.
(4) If you refuse to submit to field sobriety testing, the officer has the right to arrest you on the spot on suspicion of driving drunk or impaired.
[see all DUI and DWI blogs of Charles Jerome Ware on the Internet; Maryland Code Annotated]
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
A. Maryland Drunk Driving Laws: DUI Versus DWI
Under Maryland drunk driving laws, a distinction is made between being over the legal blood-alcohol limit and driving while impaired by alcohol.(1) Driving while impaired (DWI) is considered a lesser offense than driving under the influence (DUI), and thus the penalties for DWI are less severe than those for DUI.
(2) You may be arrested and charged with a DUI in Maryland if, via chemical testing, a police officer determines that your blood-alcohol content is .08 percent or higher. This is the legal limit in Maryland and in just about every other state in the U.S.
(3) To receive the lesser charge of a DWI in Maryland, your blood-alcohol content must fall between .07 and .08 percent. Once again, this will be determined through chemical testing.
B. Suspicion of Drinking and Driving in Maryland
(1) Under Maryland drunk driving laws, a police officer may pull you over on suspicion of either a DUI or DWI for a number of reasons.(2) One of the most common reasons an officer may pull you over is because you committed a traffic violation. Examples of traffic violations include:
- Driving through a red light
- Failing to stop at a stop sign
- Driving with your headlights off at night
- Speeding
- Driving in two lanes at once
- Weaving in and out of a lane
- Driving too slowly
- Hesitating before passing through a green light
C. Field Sobriety and Breathalyzer Tests
(1) If, after observing you up close, the officer still suspects you of being intoxicated, he or she may ask you to step out of the vehicle and submit to field sobriety tests.(2) Field sobriety testing is used by Maryland police to determine whether someone is probably drunk. Possible field sobriety tests that an officer might use in a Maryland drunk driving incident include:
- Saying the alphabet
- Standing on one leg
- Walking in a straight line
- Following a moving object with your eyes without moving your head
D. Refusing Chemical Testing. Caveat Emptor!
(1) Under Maryland drunk driving law, if you refuse to undergo chemical testing, including a breathalyzer test, you may be subject to some stiff administrative penalties.(2) For example, you may have your driver's license immediately suspended for 120 days for a first offense. After that, you could have your license suspended for one year, just for refusing a breathalyzer test.
(3) Maryland is one of a handful of states that does allow you to have an attorney present while taking a chemical test to determine blood-alcohol content. Once arrested by police, you will have the constitutional right to a DWI attorney. As long as your lawyer can appear within two hours of your arrest, you can delay your chemical testing until your attorney arrives.
(4) If you refuse to submit to field sobriety testing, the officer has the right to arrest you on the spot on suspicion of driving drunk or impaired.
[see all DUI and DWI blogs of Charles Jerome Ware on the Internet; Maryland Code Annotated]
ABOUT DEFENSE ATTORNEY CHARLES WARE
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference." We can help you. Guaranteed.Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
NO GUARANTEES: GRANDPARENT RIGHTS IN MARYLAND
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
[The information provided herein is not designed nor intended to be legal advice]
The issue of grandparents rights comes up frequently in my law practice.
Grandparent visitation rights are not guaranteed nor assured in Maryland. The "best interest of the child" is the standard legal guide here.
The visitation rights of grandparents are written in Maryland law and can be found in the Maryland Annotated Code, Family Law Article §9-102. The statute was last amended in 1993, and now reads as follows:
"An Equity Court may:
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) addressed the issue of third party visitation in Troxel v. Granville, 120 S.Ct. 2054 (1999). In a case brought by grandparents who sought an expanded visitation schedule, the court held unconstitutional a Washington state statute that allowed a court to award visitation to any third party at any time based solely on the best interest of the child standard.
Subsequently, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, citing Troxel, held that the trial court violated a mother’s Constitutional rights when it ordered her to comply with an increased visitation order between her child and the paternal grandparents. [See Brice v. Brice, 133 Md. App. 302 (2000)].
In Brice, the mother did not oppose or deny visitation between the daughter and the grandparents but she did object to the court imposing a schedule. The court did not find that Fam. Law § 9-102 is unconstitutional. Instead, the court found that application of the statute was improper because no court had found the mother unfit and visitation had not been denied.
Thus, in Maryland, grandparents can still file a petition for visitation under Maryland Annotated Code, Family Law Article, § 9-102. However, it appears that the petition will only be considered if the parent has been found unfit, exceptional circumstances existed or the parent denied grandparent visitation all together.
In 2007, the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed that parents have a fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children and that grandparents may only be awarded visitation only if they show that the parents are unfit or exceptional circumstances exist.
"To preserve fundamental parental liberty interests, we now apply a gloss to the Maryland Grandparent Visitation Statute requiring a threshold showing of either parental unfitness or exceptional circumstances indicating that the lack of grandparental visitation has a significant deleterious effect upon the children who are the subject of the petition."
[Koshko v. Haining, 398 Md. 404, 441 (2007)]
[see, http://www.peoples-law.org/grandparent-visitation-rights; John Fader & Richard Gilbert, Maryland Family Law §6-6 (4th Ed. 2005)]
[The information provided herein is not designed nor intended to be legal advice]
The issue of grandparents rights comes up frequently in my law practice.
Grandparent visitation rights are not guaranteed nor assured in Maryland. The "best interest of the child" is the standard legal guide here.
The visitation rights of grandparents are written in Maryland law and can be found in the Maryland Annotated Code, Family Law Article §9-102. The statute was last amended in 1993, and now reads as follows:
"An Equity Court may:
- consider a Petition for reasonable visitation of a grandchild by a grandparent; and
- if the Court finds it to be in the best interest of the child, grant visitation rights to grandparent." [MD Code Family Law § 9-102]
Case Rulings
As in all visitation cases, the court will always consider the best interest of the child in deciding whether to grant visitation. Generally, the court will honor the wishes of the custodial parent and presume that any schedule for visitation presented by the parent is in the best interest of the child.The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) addressed the issue of third party visitation in Troxel v. Granville, 120 S.Ct. 2054 (1999). In a case brought by grandparents who sought an expanded visitation schedule, the court held unconstitutional a Washington state statute that allowed a court to award visitation to any third party at any time based solely on the best interest of the child standard.
Subsequently, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, citing Troxel, held that the trial court violated a mother’s Constitutional rights when it ordered her to comply with an increased visitation order between her child and the paternal grandparents. [See Brice v. Brice, 133 Md. App. 302 (2000)].
In Brice, the mother did not oppose or deny visitation between the daughter and the grandparents but she did object to the court imposing a schedule. The court did not find that Fam. Law § 9-102 is unconstitutional. Instead, the court found that application of the statute was improper because no court had found the mother unfit and visitation had not been denied.
Thus, in Maryland, grandparents can still file a petition for visitation under Maryland Annotated Code, Family Law Article, § 9-102. However, it appears that the petition will only be considered if the parent has been found unfit, exceptional circumstances existed or the parent denied grandparent visitation all together.
In 2007, the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed that parents have a fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children and that grandparents may only be awarded visitation only if they show that the parents are unfit or exceptional circumstances exist.
"To preserve fundamental parental liberty interests, we now apply a gloss to the Maryland Grandparent Visitation Statute requiring a threshold showing of either parental unfitness or exceptional circumstances indicating that the lack of grandparental visitation has a significant deleterious effect upon the children who are the subject of the petition."
[Koshko v. Haining, 398 Md. 404, 441 (2007)]
[see, http://www.peoples-law.org/grandparent-visitation-rights; John Fader & Richard Gilbert, Maryland Family Law §6-6 (4th Ed. 2005)]
COMMON LAW MARRIAGES AND DIVORCES IN MARYLAND
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
A "common law" marriage, defined or described as a relationship in which a couple lives together as spouses but has not participated in a lawful marriage ceremony, cannot be created in the State of Maryland. In other words, a couple cannot acquire marital rights and responsibilities in Maryland by simply living together for a specified period of time. Further, no legal action is required to dissolve such a relationship---which essentially has no legal standing.
The State of Maryland does, however, recognize as valid, "Common law" marriages which were lawfully created in other states and countries, provided the legal requirements for "common law" marriage in those states and countries have been met. In those specific cases, legal action is in fact necessary to dissolve those legal "common law" marriages created in other states and foreign countries in compliance with their licensing and ceremonial regulations. Maryland courts can then determine the rights of the parties now living in Maryland.
For the important purposes of spousal benefits, pension plans, other retirement issues, social security, and inheritance, etc., a valid marriage in Maryland is required.
Individuals should consult an attorney with specific questions as to whether a marriage is valid in Maryland.
[Charles Jerome Ware is a Maryland-based national divorce attorney. You may contact him with questions or an initial courtesy consultation at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016. The information provided above and herein is not designed nor intended to be legal advice]
A "common law" marriage, defined or described as a relationship in which a couple lives together as spouses but has not participated in a lawful marriage ceremony, cannot be created in the State of Maryland. In other words, a couple cannot acquire marital rights and responsibilities in Maryland by simply living together for a specified period of time. Further, no legal action is required to dissolve such a relationship---which essentially has no legal standing.
The State of Maryland does, however, recognize as valid, "Common law" marriages which were lawfully created in other states and countries, provided the legal requirements for "common law" marriage in those states and countries have been met. In those specific cases, legal action is in fact necessary to dissolve those legal "common law" marriages created in other states and foreign countries in compliance with their licensing and ceremonial regulations. Maryland courts can then determine the rights of the parties now living in Maryland.
For the important purposes of spousal benefits, pension plans, other retirement issues, social security, and inheritance, etc., a valid marriage in Maryland is required.
Individuals should consult an attorney with specific questions as to whether a marriage is valid in Maryland.
[Charles Jerome Ware is a Maryland-based national divorce attorney. You may contact him with questions or an initial courtesy consultation at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016. The information provided above and herein is not designed nor intended to be legal advice]
KEY MARYLAND HOLIDAY CHECKPOINTS AND STRATEGIES, 2014-15
Local Maryland police departments have announced key Maryland holiday DUI checkpoints, including sobriety checkpoints as well as strategies for underage alcohol sales. These checkpoints and strategies will be in operation through January 15, 2015:
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
- Sobriety checkpoints at traditional geographic locations with high-volume DUI arrests and citations;
- Compliance checks of businesses that hold retail alcohol licenses by using underage volunteers to attempt purchases;
- Plain clothes surveillance by police officers of alcohol-selling businesses to insure no underage sales;
- Public encouragement of and quick response to telephone calls and other complaints of underage drinking parties; and
- Sobriety checkpoints near popular alcohol-drinking "spots" such as bars, restaurants, etc.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
UBER Ride-Sharing vs. TAXI CAB INDUSTRY: The Battle Begins in Franchising in NEVADA
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com. "Here to make a difference."
UBER, the up-and-coming ride-sharing service that has major aspirations for thousands of future franchises as well as its first IPO has encountered a legal snag to its ambitions in the State of Nevada, of all places.
As of December 1st, 2014, UBER has temporarily suspended its business operations in Nevada, after a local court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting its commercial operations statewide.
The district court judge issued the restraining order against UBER after a case was filed to restrain its commercial activities on November 24th, 2014. UBER arrived in Nevada on October 24th, 2014, and immediately faced problems with the Nevada Taxicab and Transportation Authority from the very beginning. In its first 30 or so days of operation in Nevada, it was reported that at least 50 UBER-related cars were impounded.
The Transportation Authority and other opposition argue that UBER must follow the same guidelines and restrictions as "other taxi companies."
[The information presented is not designed nor intended to be legal advice. Charles Jerome Ware, a premier trial and franchise attorney, can be reached at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016. His national law practice is headquartered in the Maryland and Washington, D.C. area.]
UBER, the up-and-coming ride-sharing service that has major aspirations for thousands of future franchises as well as its first IPO has encountered a legal snag to its ambitions in the State of Nevada, of all places.
As of December 1st, 2014, UBER has temporarily suspended its business operations in Nevada, after a local court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting its commercial operations statewide.
The district court judge issued the restraining order against UBER after a case was filed to restrain its commercial activities on November 24th, 2014. UBER arrived in Nevada on October 24th, 2014, and immediately faced problems with the Nevada Taxicab and Transportation Authority from the very beginning. In its first 30 or so days of operation in Nevada, it was reported that at least 50 UBER-related cars were impounded.
The Transportation Authority and other opposition argue that UBER must follow the same guidelines and restrictions as "other taxi companies."
[The information presented is not designed nor intended to be legal advice. Charles Jerome Ware, a premier trial and franchise attorney, can be reached at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016. His national law practice is headquartered in the Maryland and Washington, D.C. area.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)