Wednesday, May 29, 2013

"RUNNY-EGG RULE" UPHELD BY 5TH CIRCUIT: Federal Update By Charles Ware, Attorney & Author

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com ("We fight.  You win.")

Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is renowned and consistently ranked among the best attorneys and legal counsellors in the United States. [GQ Magazine, The Washington Post, The Baltimore Sun, The Columbia Flier, USA TODAY, The Howard County Sun, The Anniston Star, The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX-TV NEWS, WHUR, WHUT, MPT, BBC, The Wall Street Journal, ABA Journal, et al.]

5TH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DISSECTS "RUNNY EGG RULE", ISSUES SUNNY-SIDE-UP DECISION FOR TEXAS NURSING HOME:

A Texas nursing home red-hot and sizzling over severe penalties imposed after a state inspection found two residents had been served unpasteurized eggs that were inadequately cooked has presumably simmered down to a low-boil after the latest chapter in the "runny-egg" saga.

Reversing an administrative law judge and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Appeals Board, the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that Elgin Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in fact, did not violate an egg-cooking rule in a Medicare and Medicaid operations manual, Courthouse News reports [5/28/2013].

At issue, explains Chief Judge Jerry Smith in an opinion earlier this month, is whether two provisions of the "runny-egg  rule", one based on temperature and the other (2) on the extent to which the egg has congealed, apply simultaneously to the same egg.

The 5th Circuit panel found the two provisions operated independently of each other. Therefore, satisfying either the temperature prong or the 'congealing' prong of the "runny-egg rule" was sufficient, and the nursing home was out of the frying pan, and not in the fire, as far an the already-reduced $5,000 fine for noncompliance was concerned.

HHS "may not issue ambiguous interpretive documents and then interpret those in enforcement actions—we will not defer to that level of agency interpretation," Chief Judge Smith wrote.

[www.abajournal.com/news/article/5-28-2013]

No comments:

Post a Comment