Wednesday, October 22, 2014

VICTIM/PATIENT RIGHTS IN COSMETIC/PLASTIC SURGERY NEGLIGENCE CASES: MARYLAND MED. MAL. ATTORNEY

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
Cosmetic (plastic) surgery is not cosmetology, nor entertainment, nor a hobby.  It is medicine-based.  It is surgery.  It is not just a business or commercial enterprise as portrayed frequently in the media. 
Those who choose to have cosmetic (plastic) surgery performed on them are "patients" who do not waive their rights to redress or relief for malpractice by the surgeon.
Any patient who has suffered any kind of damage, scarring or other problems due to medical negligence during cosmetic surgery has a right to claim compensation for cosmetic surgery malpractice.
COSMETIC SURGERY "BOOM"

A person who suffers due to malpractice from plastic surgery can claim compensation for any of the following:
1. Excessive scarring;
2. Uneven results (breast-size unequalness, e.g.);
3. Infection;
4. Nerve damage;
5. Lack of informed consent;
6. Wrongful death; etc.
Persons who choose plastic surgeons put enormous amounts of trust in the surgeons' ability to treat them well.  However, the current media-driven "boom" in cosmetic surgery, including the many clinics and "spas" who have doctors and nurses who are not properly qualified, or who are negligent in their treatment of patients, has created an atmosphere of distrust in the field.
It is important to note that once the patient comes under the cosmetic (plastic) surgeon's care and/or counsel, regardless of how many nurses or other healthcare professionals are involved, it is principally the legal responsibility of the surgeon to care for the patient and follow the proper medical practices and rules.
[Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors, LLC, is a premier Maryland-based medical malpractice law firm.  For an initial courtesy consultation, call the firm at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016]








BODY AESTHETICS AND COSMETIC (PLASTIC) SURGERY: MARYLAND MED. MAL. ATTORNEY

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
[This information presented herein is not intended, nor should be interpreted, to be legal advice]
Increasingly in our "body aesthetics" society where "looks" or appearances dominate, cosmetic (plastic) surgery is popular.  However, the commodization and overzealous marketing of cosmetic surgery procedures may frequently compromise patient safety.  The key problem is that cosmetic surgery should not be treated as a commodity because, quite simply and frankly, it is not one.
Unlike most commodities or commercial products, cosmetic (plastic) surgery is not "interchangeable."  Patients are not uniform (instead, they are dissimilar), cosmetic surgeons are unique in their capabilities, and plastic surgery techniques are individualized.  Despite its present image, cosmetic surgery is still more medicine than business.
Trademarked labels and gadgets come and go in the cosmetic surgery field, but only a few prove to be genuinely effective.  Seldomly, however, does any new product prove to be as effective and important as the good plastic surgeon's expertise.  The bottom line is that patient safety and education should always take priority or precedence over any business or commercial concern [see, September/October 2013 issue, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Dr. Eric Swanson, Leawood, Kansas].
There are many pitfalls that cosmetic (plastic) surgeons should avoid.  Just a few are as follows:
  1. Always remember --- and never forget --- that the person you are performing surgery on is a "patient" and not just a customer.  Dis-remember this point to your peril.
  2. "Informed consent" is an important process, not just a signed document executed by the patient.
  3. Generally, fraud and abuse claims by patients against doctors have no statute of limitations and are not covered by liability insurance.
  4. HIPAA (health privacy law) is created to protect the patient's privacy and covers medical records and photography of the patient ("Doc Hollywood-surgeons beware!)
  5. Further, by the way, divulging patient information in a blog or otherwise on social media (website, etc.) is a HIPAA violation.
  6. An "express warranty" may be established by including in the record a photograph, drawing, or picture that the patient believes will be their result from the cosmetic surgery.
  7. There are many more pitfalls...
[http://www.plasticsurgerypractice.com/2013/09/first-do-no-harm; http://expertconsultbook.com/medico-legal-issues-in-plastic-surgery; (book) "Understanding the Law: A Primer," Charles Jerome Ware (2008)]
Attorney Charles Jerome Ware is a premier medical malpractice attorney with a nationally respected reputation.  He is headquartered in Columbia, Howard County, Maryland.  For an initial courtesy consultation, call him at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016.




NEW MARYLAND "COSMETIC SURGERY" LAW (ARCHIVES, 2012): MARYLAND MED. MAL. LAWYER

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
On October 2nd, 2012, a new Maryland law went into effect that enabled consumer (patients) to better select "qualified" physicians [Maryland House Bill 957; Medical News Today, October 2, 2012; http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/250932.php].
The new law requires physicians who publicize board certifications to announce their certifying board as well as their specialty.  Additionally, the law states that the only acceptable, certifying boards, are the 24 members of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), the alleged authoritative specialty board for all U.S. physicians.
Though relevant for all Maryland physicians, the law was particularly written for the "protection" of cosmetic (plastic) surgery patients.  It serves to weed out many doctors from other medical specialties who claim, but are not properly trained, in plastic surgery.
In the field of cosmetic (plastic) surgery specifically, to be certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) a physician candidate must satisfy the following criteria:
  1. Must be a graduate of an accredited medical school;
  2. Must have finished a prerequisite surgical residency program (generally 3 to 5 years);
  3. Must have completed training in an approved plastic surgery program (2 to 3 years);
  4. Must have been recommended for ABPS certification by a chairperson of their training program;
  5. Must have passed a written and an oral exam;
  6. Must have submitted inventory of all operations performed; and
  7. Must meet ABPS ethical and moral standards.
[Charles Jerome Ware is a Maryland-based premier medical malpractice attorney with a nationally-respected reputation for client satisfaction and successful representation.  For an initial courtesy consultation, call him at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016]


Saturday, October 18, 2014

Attorney Charles Ware's Blog: EBOLAGIST (Definition), www.charlesjeromeware.com

Attorney Charles Ware's Blog: EBOLAGIST (Definition), www.charlesjeromeware.com: The new word " Ebolagist" was first coined by Attorney Charles Jerome Ware, of Columbia, Maryland, to refer to medical personnel, ...

EBOLAGIST (Definition), www.charlesjeromeware.com

The new word " Ebolagist" was first coined by Attorney Charles Jerome Ware, of Columbia, Maryland, to refer to medical personnel, scholars, physicians, scholars and others who specialize in the study, research, care and treatment of Ebola patients.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

("CCD") MARYLAND CANNABIS (MARIJUANA), CARS AND DUIs: "BEST 10 DUI & DWI ATTORNEY"

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
A. MARIJUANA USE IN MARYLAND, 2014

On October 1st, 2014, possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana in Maryland became a civil offense.  It has been decriminalized in the state, but not legalized.  Previously, those caught by law enforcement with less than 10 grams of cannabis could be charged with a criminal offense.  Now, they will receive a civil citation similar to a traffic ticket.  Civil citation penalties include $100 for a first offense, $250 for a second offense and $500 for a third offense.  Three-time offenders and teenage first-time offenders may be required to attend a drug education program.
Although Maryland has not decriminalized possession of paraphernalia, it is not expected that state prosecutors will vigorously pursue this offense separately.  It is anticipated that Maryland will decriminalize possession of paraphernalia in 2015. 
B. MARYLAND CARS, 2014

Maryland cars (drivers) are now required to move over into an open lane away from tow trucks attending to roadside emergencies, or to slow down to a "reasonable" and "Prudent" speed that is "safe", just as they have been required to do when approaching police and other emergency vehicles stopped on the road side.
Additionally, another new law creates added penalties for drivers who cause accidents resulting in death or serious injury while texting (text messaging) or talking on hand-held cell phones.  Offenders of this new law face penalties of up to a year in jail and a fine of $5,000.
C. MARIJUANA DUIs
Maryland drunk driving laws are strict and complex.  It is very important that you contact us as soon as possible after you are arrested for drunk driving.
After a DUI arrest, you have only 10 days from the date of the arrest to request a Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) hearing with the office of administrative hearings and pay $150 to the Maryland State Treasurer. If a person is arrested for drunk driving or DUI and fails to request the hearing on time, their license will be suspended automatically.
In Maryland the blood alcohol concentration level (BAC) for a DUI (driving under the influence)arrest is .08 or higher. A blood alcohol concentration level of .07 will result in a DWI (driving while impaired) arrest.
Maryland DUI
  • Minimum drivers license suspension of 45 days.
  • Punishment of up to $1000 and 1 year in jail for a first offense DUI.
  • Punishment of up to $2000 and 2 year in jail for a second offense DUI.
  • A DUI conviction will result in 12 points on your Maryland drivers license record.
Maryland DWI
  • Drivers license suspension of up to 60 days.
  • Punishment of up to $500 and 2 months in jail for a first offense DWI.
  • Punishment of up to $500 and 1 year in jail for a second offense DWI.
  • A DWI conviction will result in 8 points on your Maryland drivers license record.
If you hold an out of state license and are arrested for DUI or DWI, you will need to schedule a Maryland MVA hearing in order to protect your driving privileges. Maryland is a member of the Interstate Driver's License Compact, which shares information about all driver's license actions with other member states. There are 45 states that belong to this compact.
Self-representation is not a good idea for anyone charged with DUI or DWI in Maryland.  The laws prohibiting drinking and driving, though Transportation Article-based, carry criminal penalties.  Without legal representation, the defendant (driver) may be fined or put in jail.

MARYLAND POLICE BRUTALITY AND TERRENCE G. JOHNSON: PRE-FERGUSON, MO. INJUSTICE


www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
Charles Jerome Ware is a premier Maryland-based criminal defense attorney.  Attorney Ware represented Terrence Johnson during Johnson's parole process.
"No real sense of justice
July 30, 1991|By Wiley A. Hall 3rd| Baltimore Sun.
Negative message!
You wanna talk about a negative message? Keeping Terrence G. Johnson in prison sends the negative message to end all negative messages.
Yet yesterday, the Maryland Parole Commission said it voted unanimously to keep Johnson in prison for another eight years specifically to avoid this very thing.
"Our bottom line," said Paul J. Davis, commission chairman, "was that with violence on the rise in the community, we'd be sending a negative message out, and so the unanimous decision was to refuse parole."
Johnson, now 27, was convicted of manslaughter in the 1978 shooting death of Prince George's County police Officer Albert M. Claggett 4th.
So, I suppose Davis is saying the commission wanted to make it clear that it is not OK to kill cops in Maryland. And, he's right. It would be tragic, indeed, if the commission ever suggested by word or deed that it condoned killing cops.
But let's consider Johnson's case carefully. He was not a violent criminal when the state charged him with the first-degree murder of two Prince George's police officers. In fact, he was a scrawny, baby-faced, 15-year-old at the time, an average student in school with no criminal record.
He wasn't even a criminal suspect when police brought him and his brother into the Hyattsville district police station in June 1978. Police wanted to question his older brother about vandalism to a laundromat coin box. They held young Terrence there to wait for his parents.
But at some point that summer evening, according to testimony during his trial, young Terrence started mouthing off and Officer Claggett dragged him into a small fingerprint room and began to beat him up. In a blind panic, and fearing for his life, young Terrence grabbed the officer's service revolver and shot him in the stomach.
Afterward, he burst from the room, firing the gun wildly, fatally shooting a second officer, James B. Swart. The teen was charged with two counts of first-degree murder and handgun violations.
The case polarized an already divided community. Young Terrence is black. The two officers were white. At the time of the shooting, blacks had made several allegations of police brutality against Prince George's police, which the white power structure angrily denied.
There were even allegations of a "Death Squad" of detectives, operating out of the same Hyattsville station, that used undercover agents to recruit black teens for robberies then shot the youths during the commission of the crime.
Despite this racially charged atmosphere, members of a predominantly white jury apparently accepted young Terrence's story. They found him guilty of a lesser charge of manslaughter in Claggett's death and not guilty by reason of insanity in the death of Swart.
So, on the record, Johnson is not a typical, cold-blooded killer. The head of the parole board conceded as much yesterday.
"Yes," said Davis, "my sense was that, at the very least, the jury believed he [Johnson] at least feared he was going to be attacked by the first officer, and that he was smacked, and that that's when he grabbed the officer's gun."
The chairman also conceded that Johnson has been a model prisoner, earning high school and college diplomas in prison, and that at least half of the mail on this case -- from both blacks and whites -- has strongly urged that he be paroled.
But all of that meant nothing compared to the commission's determination not to send that "negative message."
"The commissioners determined that the good -- his institutional progress, his academic achievements -- didn't outweigh the bad," said Davis, "the bad being our perception of the impact of the crime on the community. And not just in P.G. County, but in Maryland and beyond."
"Who do they think they're fooling," countered attorney Charles Ware, who represented Johnson during the parole process. "This isn't about violence in the streets. It is a constitutional issue: How far can a citizen go when he is being beaten to death by people in authority?
"The parole board is telling black folks the system will not do the right thing for them, that if you want justice, you have to take to the streets and fight for it."
This, you will agree, is a negative message. It is a message that says the board is ruled more by politics than justice.
It is a message that stinks.
["No Real Sense of Justice," The Baltimore Sun, http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1991-07-30-news/]