Thursday, November 6, 2014

("BDD") BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER AND COSMETIC SURGERY: MARYLAND MED. MAL. ATTORNEY

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
[The information provided herein is not intended to be legal advice]
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ("BDD") is an increasing concern as it relates to the field of cosmetic/plastic surgery.
An article/brochure from the Mayo Clinic on Body Dysmorphic Disorder describes BDD as follows:
Body dysmorphic disorder is a type of chronic mental illness in which you can’t stop thinking about a flaw with your appearance — a flaw that is either minor or imagined. But to you, your appearance seems so shameful that you don’t want to be seen by anyone. Body dysmorphic disorder has sometimes been called ‘imagined ugliness.’
The Mayo Clinic staff
LEGAL INFORMED CONSENT
Recent years have seen an increased awareness of plastic surgery patients with Body Dismorphic Disorder (BDD). One of the major concerns about patients with BDD is that they may not be legally competent to give an informed consent for the cosmetic procedures they elect to have.
A medical malpractice lawsuit involved a woman who, displeased with her abdominoplasty scars, claimed that she had been incapable of giving a genuinely informed consent because she had BDD. The case was later dismissed; the court ruled that the plaintiff’s surgeon had followed acceptable medical practice and did not have sufficient reason to refer the patient to a psychiatrist before surgery. The case does, however, highlight some of the problems BDD poses for informed consent when it comes to cosmetic/plastic surgery.
The legal definition of "informed consent" is somewhat broad, but it provides guidelines for determining the mental competency of the patient before they can consent to elective surgery. The law requires that doctors provide complete and accurate information about the procedure and its risks to the patient, and the patient must not be coerced or pressured in any way.
Ultimately, a truly legally competent patient must be capable of refusing consent to surgery.
When a psychological disorder (such as BDD, dementia, a learning disorder, or a manic episode) may prevent a patient from understanding the risks and likely result of a surgery they wish to have, the question arises as to whether their consent is legitimate.
Although a patient’s consent cannot be retroactively revoked if they are diagnosed with BDD after surgery, plastic surgeons are always on the watch for signs of BDD when consulting with prospective patients. This is especially important in the field of plastic surgery because people with BDD are likely to seek surgical solutions to what they believe is wrong with them.
[Sources: "Informed Consent in Body Dysmorphic Disorder," Medscape Medical News; http://drnichter.com/tag/plastic-surgery]
Medical malpractice attorney Charles Jerome Ware is Maryland/D.C.-based.  For an initial courtesy consultation, or questions, call him at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016, or email him at charlesjeromeware@msn.com.

CONSTITUTIONAL DUI & DWI DEFENSE: MARYLAND "BEST 10" AIDUIA ATTORNEY

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
Constitutional concepts surrounding the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments play a significant role in defending against DUI and DWI ("Drunk Driving") charges.
The key principle of the 4th Amendment is that people must be secure in their homes, cars, documents, other belongings as well as their person.  The public must be secure against "unreasonable searches and seizures."
The main principle of the 5th Amendment is that persons accused of crimes cannot be compelled to testify or present any evidence against themselves.  You have a right to remain silent [Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602].
The principle of the 6th Amendment is to insure that an accused has access and the right to an attorney at all critical stages of criminal proceeding (including DUI and DWI cases) [McNutt v. Superior Court, 133 Ariz. 7(1982)].
ABOUT ATTORNEY CHARLES WARE
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."  We can help you.  Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.

Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

TITLE 10 AND BALTIMORE LEAD POISONING CASES: MARYLAND DEFENSE LAWYERS

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.
Title 10 of the Housing and Community Development Act and Its Impact on Lead Poisoning Cases in Baltimore, Maryland:
A. REFERENCE NOTES:
  1. 42 U.S.C. §4852(d), Public Law §102-550.
  2. See 40 C.F.R. §745.100-119.
  3. See 40 C.F.R. §745.102.
  4. See 40 C.F.R. §745.113.
  5. 100.
  6. 103.
  7. See, e.g., Lanthier v. Fereleto, 237 A.D.2d 877, 654 N.Y.S.2d 531 (4th Dep't 1997).
  8. 42 U.S.C.A. §4852d(b)(3)(4) (emphasis added).
  9. Id.
  10. Id.
  11. See other, Baltimore, Maryland and District of Columbia lead-based paint  poisoning BLOGS by Attorney Charles Jerome Ware.
[This blog is intended and designed for informational purposes only, and not for legal advice.  This blog does not establish an attorney-client relationship with the reader nor anyone else]
TITLE 10
The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, also known as Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act, directs the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish regulations "for the disclosure of lead-based paint hazards in target housing which is offered for sale or lease."
Title X also mandates that each contract for the purchase and sale of any interest in target housing must contain a specified "Lead Warning Statement," a set out in the statute, as well as signed acknowledgement by the purchaser or lessee that he or she has read and understood the lead warning statement, received a lead hazard information pamphlet, and had ten days to conduct "a risk assessment or inspection" for lead-based paint hazards.
Title X, designed to educate the public about the hazards of lead-based paint, does not require testing or abatement of a lead-based paint condition.  It sets out the specific lead warning statement that must be included "on a separate sheet of paper attached to the contract," and it further provides that when the seller or lessor has an agent to sell or lease "target housing," the agent is required to ensure compliance with the statute.  In addition, Title X provides for both civil and criminal penalties for violations of its provisions and authorizes HUD to seek injunctive relief for such violations.
The 1996 Regulations
In March 1996, HUD and EPA issued joint regulations implementing Title X.  The Title X regulations became effective on September 6, 1996, for "owners of more than four residential dwellings" and on December 6, 1996, for "owners of one to four residential dwellings."
Besides setting more specific guidelines, the Title X regulations require sellers and lessors and their agents to maintain the disclosure records for at least three years.  The purpose of the Title X regulations is stated as follows:
Under this subpart, a seller or lessor of target housing shall disclose to the purchaser or lessee the presence of any known lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards; provide available records and reports; provide the purchaser or lessee with a lead hazard information pamphlet; give purchasers a 10-day opportunity to conduct a risk assessment or inspection; and attach specific disclosure and warning language to the sales or leasing contract before the purchaser or lessee is obligated under a contract to purchase or lease target housing.
 
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."  We can help you.  Guaranteed.

Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.

Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.

"LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD" (LBPH) Defined: Baltimore Defense Attorney Update

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com
The action level for LBP (Lead-Based Paint) established in the LBPPPA (Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act) amendments in the 1987 Housing Act is a lead content of 1.0 mg/cm2 as measured by an XRF analyzer.  Some State and local regulations have set a lower level at 0.5 mg/cm2.  Since there is some concern about the reliability of XRF results at these levels, these Guidelines recommend back-up chemical testing utilizing AAS or inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES).  When using chemical testing, the action level is either 0.5% by weight for 1.0 mg/cm2.

It should be noted that portable XRF analysis and laboratory testing may not provide directly comparable information; XRF results are calibrated to report mass of lead per unit area (area concentration) of a painted surface. AAS and ICP-AES, which report results in either mg/cm2 or weight percent, are bulk sample analysis methods.
Maryland is one of two original states (along with Massachusetts) that has promulgated regulations covering LBP abatement.  Other states have joined in.
The Maryland regulations are in Title 26, Department of the Environment, Subtitle 02, August 1988.  Also, LBP is addressed in the Maryland Occupational and Health Standard, Occupational Exposure to Lead in Construction, COMAR 09.12.32, January 16, 1984.
ABOUT ATTORNEY CHARLES WARE
 
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."  We can help you.  Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Charles Ware is highly-regarded by his many satisfied landlord clients for his successful representation as a lead paint defense attorney.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.

MARYLAND "RETROACTIVE" SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services v. John Doe, Misc. No. 1, September Term 2013; and Hershberger v. John Roe, No. 103, September Term 2013 (Opinion by Justice Greene).
_____________________________________________________________
Statutory Interpretation: Sex Offender And Notification Act ("SORNA"):
Under Maryland law, the retroactive application of Maryland's sex offender registry is unconstitutional [Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, 430 Md. 535, 62A.3d 123 (2013)].
The federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), Pub. L. No. 109-248, §§ 101-155, 120 Stat. 587, 590-611 (2006) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §16901, et seq. and 18 U.S.C. 2250) includes both directives to the states regarding the implementation of a sex offender registration scheme and directives to individual sex offenders to register in the state in which they reside, are employed, or are a student.
Where SORNA includes a provision regarding the resolution of conflicts between the federal law and state constitutions, an individual to whom the registration requirement would be applied retroactively cannot be required to register involuntarily as a sex offender in Maryland.
ABOUT ATTORNEY CHARLES WARE
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."  We can help you.  Guaranteed.
Among his numerous other legal awards and honors such as "America's Best Attorneys and Counselors", U.S. Super Lawyer, "Top Lawyers in America", Top Attorneys and Counselors in the U.S., "Top Lawyers in Maryland", and winner of the national "Charles Hamilton Houston Award for Outstanding Litigation", premier criminal defense attorney Charles Ware is recognized and ranked by hi many satisfied clients as well as his legal peers as "One of the 10 BEST DUI and DWI Attorneys in the State of Maryland," as confirmed from research, surveys and other investigation by The American Institute of DUI and DWI Attorneys [AIDUIA] --- a respected national organization of trial lawyers.
Attorney Ware is also the founder and senior partner of the Maryland-based national business, criminal defense and civil trial law firm Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, call Mr. Ware at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.

Monday, November 3, 2014

MARYLAND ALZHEIMER'S AND DIMINISHED "LEGAL CAPACITY" UPDATE FOR CARETAKERS, GUARDIANS, ET AL.

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
[This blog is presented for informational purposes only.  It is not intended nor designed to be legal advice; nor does it establish an attorney-client relationship.  Readers are advised to consult an attorney directly for any legal advice or consultation.  The authors appreciate and thank several sources for any information they have provided for this particular blog including, among others, The Elder & Disability Law Center (www.ed.lc.com), The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (www.jaapl.org), The Alzheimer's Association (www.alz.org), the NIH National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer's Disease Education and Referral Center, etc.]
I. LEGAL CAPACITY
As America's elderly population continues to steadily increase, issues of Alzheimer's mental incapacity, and diminished capacity, etc., are becoming more and more common in law firms.  The fact is that many clients and their loved ones are not prepared sufficiently to handle and legal and financial consequences of a serious illness such as Alzheimer's disease. 
Lawyers and doctors encourage clients (patients), their families and other loved ones recently observed or diagnosed with a serious illness --- particularly an illness that is expected to cause declining mental and physical health --- to both examine and update their legal and financial healthcare arrangements as quickly as possible.
Basic legal and financial instruments such as (I) wills), (ii) living trusts, (iii) advance directives, and (iv) powers of attorney ("POAs"), etc., should be considered and executed to ensure that the person's late-stage or end-of-life legal, financial and healthcare decisions are carried out properly.
Although attorneys are not mental health professionals, we should have a fundamental knowledge or experience base, or competent system in place to decipher whether the client has the "legal capacity" to complete or execute legal transactions.
II. Some Examples of Deciphering "Legal Capacity" Include:
(1) Legal Standards of Diminished Capacity
Standards of capacity in legal settings vary depending on the transaction (it's mental challenge, complexity, etc.).
(2) Testamentary Capacity
The testator (client) must have the capacity to know the natural object of his/her bounty, to understand the nature and extent of his/her property, and to combine these elements to make a disposition of property according to a rational plan. Capacity is only required at the time the will is executed and does not require that the testator be capable of managing all of his/her affairs or making day-to-day business transactions.
(3) Donative Capacity
Donative capacity is similar to testamentary capacity, except some states have a higher standard, requiring not only that the donor understand the nature and purpose of the gift, but also that the donor knows the gift is irrevocable and will result in a permanent reduction in the donor's assets.
(4) Contractual Capacity
The party must be able to understand the nature and effect of the act and the business being transacted. A higher level of understanding may be needed if the contractual arrangement is complicated.
(5) Capacity to Convey Real Property
The grantor must be able to understand the nature and effect of the act at the time the conveyance is made.
(6) Capacity to Execute a Durable Power of Attorney
The capacity to execute a durable power of attorney is generally the same as contractual capacity, although some courts have held that the standard is similar to testamentary capacity.
(7) Capacity to Make Health Care Decisions
From the Uniform Health Care Decisions Act:
"Capacity" means an individual's ability to understand the significant benefits, risks and alternatives to proposed health care and to make and communicate a health-care decision.
Capacity in health care decisions is linked to informed consent, which is required for any health care decision. A person may have capacity to make a treatment decision, but the decision will lack informed consent if it was either involuntary or unknowing.
(8) Capacity to Mediate
The party must understand the nature of the mediation process, who the parties are, the role of the mediator, the parties' relationship to the mediator, and the issues at hand.
(9) Guardianships and Conservatorships
State guardianship and conservatorship laws rely on broad definitions of capacity. There are four standard tests of incapacity: disabling condition, functional behavior as to essential needs, cognitive functioning, and finding that a guardianship is necessary and is the least restrictive alternative. Generally, state law uses some combination of the four tests to determine capacity for guardianship and conservatorship purposes.
(10) Maryland
In the state of Maryland, a person lacks capacity if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person:
(i) lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person, including provisions for health care, food, clothing, or shelter, because of any mental disability, disease, habitual drunkenness or addiction to drugs; AND
(ii) no less restrictive form of intervention is available that is consistent with the person's welfare and safety.
(11) District of Columbia
In the District of Columbia, a person lacks capacity if his/her ability to receive and evaluate information effectively or to communicate decisions is impaired to such an extent that he/she lacks the capacity to manage all or some of his or her financial resources or to meet all of some essential requirements for his/her physical health, safety, habilitation or therapeutic needs without court-ordered assistance or the appointment of a guardian
(12) Assessment of Capacity
When observing a client for possible signs of diminished capacity, you should keep the following things in mind:
  • Focus on decisional abilities, not cooperativeness
  • Pay attention to changes over time – history is important
  • Beware of ageist stereotypes
  • Consider whether mitigating factors, such as stress, grief, Depression, medical issues, education and/or cultural traditions, could explain the behavior
(13) Of course, at all times of legal action (executing documents, et al.) as well as attorney-client interaction, the attorney must be certain to document his or her observations about the client's "legal" capacity" to understand and participate adequately in the process.
III. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
(a) Alzheimer’s Disease Education and Referral (ADEAR) Center
P.O. Box 8250
Silver Spring, MD 20907-8250
1-800-438-4380 (toll-free)
www.nia.nih.gov/alzheimers
The National Institute on Aging's ADEAR Center offers information and publications for families, caregivers, and professionals on diagnosis, treatment, patient care, caregiver needs, long-term care, education and training, and research related to Alzheimer's disease. Staff members answer telephone, email, and written requests and make referrals to local and national resources. Visit the ADEAR website to learn more about Alzheimer's and other dementias, find clinical trials, and sign up for email updates.
(b) Eldercare Locator
1-800-677-1116 (toll-free)
www.eldercare.gov
Families often need information about community resources, such as home care, adult day care, and nursing homes. Contact the Eldercare Locator to find these resources in your area. The Eldercare Locator is a service of the Administration on Aging.
(c) National Institute on Aging Information Center
P.O. Box 8057
Gaithersburg, MD 20898-8057
1-800-222-2225 (toll-free)
1-800-222-4225 (TTY/toll-free)
www.nia.nih.gov/health
www.nia.nih.gov/espanol
(d) National Library of Medicine
MedlinePlus

www.medlineplus.gov
Search for:
"Advance Directives"
"End-of-Life Issues"
(e) NIHSeniorHealth
www.nihseniorhealth.gov
This senior-friendly website from the National Institute on Aging and the National Library of Medicine has health and wellness information for older adults. Special features make it simple to use. For example, you can click on a button to make the type larger.
(f) AARP
601 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20049
1-888-OUR-AARP (1-888-687-2277; toll-free)
www.aarp.org
(g) Aging with Dignity
P.O. Box 1661
Tallahassee, FL 32302-1661
1-888-5WISHES (1-888-594-7437; toll-free)
www.agingwithdignity.org
(h) Alzheimer's Association
225 North Michigan Avenue, Floor 17
Chicago, IL 60601-7633
1-800-272-3900 (toll-free)
1-866-403-3073 (TDD/toll-free)
www.alz.org
(i) Alzheimer's Foundation of America
322 Eighth Avenue, 7th floor
New York, NY 10001
1-866-232-8484 (toll-free)
www.alzfdn.org
(j) American Bar Association
Commission on Law and Aging
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
1-202-662-8690
www.americanbar.org/aging
(k) Family Caregiver Alliance
785 Market Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94103
1-800-445-8106 (toll-free)
www.caregiver.org
(l) National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys
1577 Spring Hill Road, Suite 220
Vienna, VA 22182
1-703-942-5711
www.naela.org
(m) National Association of Professional Geriatric Care Managers
3275 West Ina Road, Suite 130
Tucson, AZ 85741
1-520-881-8008
www.caremanager.org
(n) National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization
1731 King Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
1-800-658-8898 (toll-free)
1-877-658-8896 (Spanish/toll-free)
www.caringinfo.org
(o) Organdonor.gov
Health Resources and Services Administration
1-877-275-4772 (toll-free)
1-877-489-4772 (TTY/toll-free)
www.organdonor.gov
[Attorney Charles Ware is a principal in the Maryland and Washington, D.C.-based national boutique law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, LLC, Attorneys and Counselors.  For an initial courtesy consultation, or questions, call the firm at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016; or email him at charlesjeromeware@msn.com]

TEN (10) BEST LEGAL MED. MAL. PRACTICES: "BEST 10" MARYLAND ATTORNEY

www.CharlesJeromeWare.com.  "Here to make a difference."
[For informational purposes only; not intended to be legal advice]
There is little doubt that medical malpractice claims can be among the most difficult cases to deal with.  The medical issues as well as the law involved can be complex, complicated, confusing, and even outright intimidating to victims, doctors, lawyers, experts, judges and, of course, juries.  These cases are also typically very expensive to pursue and to defend.  Few of these cases are "sure things."
Experts, by the way, are required in these cases.  Generally, no expert --- no case.
Simply put, attorneys and clients cannot approach medical malpractice cases in the same way as they would any other claim or lawsuit.  In fact, the vast majority of attorneys will certainly think at least twice before accepting and taking on the challenge themselves of prosecuting or pursuing a medical malpractice case.  It is, in fact, a legal specialty area.
A few key points to follow and remember in bringing a medical malpractice case are as follows:
  1. "Do not bite off more than you can chew."  These cases are complicated and expensive, so measure carefully, think about it at least twice before going forward, and consider other avenues of redress before the pursuit.
  2. Engage in careful research to make sure you understand the medical condition or medical procedure involved.
  3. Consult (on a courtesy basis) with knowledgeable colleagues (legal or otherwise) as sounding boards about the potential case ("PC").
  4. Learn and clearly understand the applicable medical guidelines and standards of care for your potential case and facts.
  5. Do verdict and settlement comparability research to get a good sense of the potential risks as well as case value.  This will help in assessing the cost-benefit, etc., of bringing a claim.
  6. Do background and other factual research on all parties involved (including, of course, your client).  Occasionally, you will be surprised by the helpful information and/or data you discover.
  7. Research and develop a fundamental and sound understanding of the relevant legal issues involved in the facts of your potential medical malpractice case.
  8. Research, locate and secure the properly-qualified expert witnesses to review, advise, and work with you on the case.  Caveat: They are generally expensive.
  9. Gather a good team to do your case.  You will need, and appreciate, their support.
[Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal partner in the Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, LLC, Attorneys & Counselors.  He can be reached at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016 for an initial courtesy consultation]